Is a custom related to the government while a contract pertains to the couple's past?

The statement is based on specific distinctions between customs and contracts in the context of family life and relationships. Customs often refer to traditional practices or norms that may be recognized within a culture or society, including those related to relationships and family structures. These customs can be influenced by governmental regulations, but they are not inherently tied to legal matters; instead, they reflect societal values and practices.

On the other hand, contracts, especially in the context of family life (such as marriage contracts or agreements), are formalized documents that detail the commitments and obligations agreed upon by the couple, typically based on their past interactions and agreements. Contracts are more structured than customs and are enforceable by law, focusing on the specifics of what the couple has agreed to rather than cultural or traditional norms.

Thus, the assertion that a custom is related to government while a contract pertains to the couple's past is misleading, as customs are not synonymous with the government and contracts extend beyond just past actions to outline future obligations. Therefore, the statement is false.